Ronnie05's Blog

Dear Apple and Steve! We miss your insanity…

Posted in Mobile Devices and Company Updates by Manas Ganguly on September 12, 2013

Apple has been one of the most innovative companies in the world. Based on the vision of Steve Jobs, it has created products that truly changed the world, such as the Macintosh, iPod, iPad, and App Store. Despite these accomplishments, Apple’s pace of innovation has slowed, causing the company to lose its edge as a market leader. Aside from creating products that delight consumers and starting an entire industry of app developers, Apple’s relentless and rapid drive for innovation has made investors wealthy. When the company released the iPod in 2001, Apple had less than $5.5 billion in revenue and its stock price hovered around $20; the company’s total market capitalization was $7 billion at that time. Today, Apple’s market capitalization is about $500 billion and its stock price is currently around $500.

Apple’s poor record on innovation in recent years is also reflected in market share numbers. According to IDC, Android has 75% of the smartphone market, compared to Apple’s 17%. In addition, Samsung holds a much larger share of the world smartphone market than does Apple.

Apple was once the leader, innovating rapidly and bringing the most interesting products in the world to market. Today, the company lives on past success and future promises, without the innovation we expect. So, yes, the lack of new products has hit Apple hard. For proof, look no farther than Apple’s poor stock performance, which is truly a measure of confidence in the company.Since Steve Jobs sad passing, Apple has released extensions to existing products rather than anything profoundly new. Product line extensions represent a natural evolution for established brands. For example, Apple has released new iPhones, faster laptops, and better screens on the iPad but nothing game changing since the original iPad.

Lack of innovation is the kiss of death for a technology company that relies on innovation as the foundation for its existence. Both Google and Samsung now offer phones and tablets in various sizes, experimenting with various form factors, sizes, and operating system features.As an interesting point of comparison, look at this chart comparing the stock performance of Apple and Samsung. The blue line shows Samsung while the red indicates Apple. Note which stock is doing more poorly:


As Apple sits still, competitors are extending the concept of mobile devices and releasing numerous products. Samsung even introduced a smart watch ahead of Apple’s anticipated offering.

With the iPhone 5C and 5S, one has to sadly acknowledge that Apple’s glory days of innovation are past. There are many who opine that Apple’s products are so good that short-term product delays don’t matter in the larger scheme of Apple greatness. This tempting argument is wrong, however, because the company has run out of “insanely great” ideas. That the real problem and explains why the company once known as the world’s innovation king is now relegated to product line extensions and little more.

The iPhone 5C and 5S are great products – but they are not fundamentally new nor are they insanely great!!

Reproduced by article by Michael Krigsman

The Apple 5S is possibly short of what it takes to keep Apple out in front.

Posted in Mobile Devices and Company Updates by Manas Ganguly on September 11, 2013

The iPhone 5S and 5C have been announced – and unlike the earlier Apple keynotes have not been able to set the fanboys, device geeks and blogosphere ablaze as is customary. Between the iPhone 5C and 5S, Apple finds itself caught in the middle of nowehere. At $599, iPhone5C is not exactly mid range and it remains to be a Veblen. It remains to be seen if the iPhone 5C with 2 year contract is able to turn the volumes for Apple – the way it would want to.


However, to me the greater dissappointment is the iPhone5S. Innovation can be looked under a 2-axis paradigm. The Vertical axis is an addition of a feature (e.g Siri, Retina Scroll etc); the Horizontal axis is the enhancement of a feature (e.g 8MP with dual flash over 5MP). The 5S scores minimally in the vertical axis and most of the additions are mostly on the horizontal axis.

1. The look and feel of the device doesnot get better. (0 on both axis)
2. The Fingerprint Sensor has innovation and novelty value. However, the Motorola Attrix 4G stakes a claim to the same feature which it launched 2 years back. The iPhone5S does have a 360 degree readibility. (However, this is +1 on the Horizontal axis)
3. Dual LED Flash- There are niceties here – but most of these are innovations or new features on the horizontal scales.(+1 on Horizontal axis)
4. The 7.6 mm thickness is a wow… but when you compare it to Galaxy S4, its just a drab tie – nothing that pushes Apple past the present standards (0 in both axis)
5. 64Bit mobile architecture and a new A7 chip – While the jury is still out on this.. but agreeably there will be some additions to speeds, performance, feel, battery life, processing power etc. (+1 on Vertical axis). For the 64bit architecture to show true colours, Apple will need to have an eco-system of Apps.
6. The iSight Camera takes the camera experience larger image sensor, aperture and increased sensitivity. In terms of usability, it scores well. (+1 on Horizontal axis)
7. iOS7 takes the incremental route to innovation – (+1 on Horizontal axis)

There you have it…. Apple’s iPhone 5S has 2 0s, 3 on Horizontal axis and 2 on Vertical axis. Thats not very Apple-esque.

The greatest grouse with Apple is taking the screen size ahead… With a 4″ screen, Apple is atleast 50% behind the 5.7-6″ form factors. The larger size screens have led the growth of the Android high end devices by leaps and bounds over the last 2 years. In 2012, when Apple announced the 4″ form factir it had seen large migrationsfrom the earlier 3.5″ Apple devices which really helped garnering record volumes. The success of the larger form factors is evident from the fact that Smartphones with screen sizes of 5- to just under 7-inch, colloquially known as phablets, overtook shipments of each of the portable PC and tablet device categories in Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) in the second quarter of 2013, according to IDC.

I dont intend to count out Apple for a few of these misses- Tim Cook and the folks at Apple do think that larger is not essentially better – a sound philosophy – but the lack of tangible innovation and features may be garish to the technology crown leader. Does iPhone 5S have it all that it takes to keep Apple out in front? Possibly not

Apple iPhone 5C and 5S

Tagged with: , ,

Will Apple’s “Volksphone” re-invent its Smartphone strategy?

Posted in Mobile Devices and Company Updates by Manas Ganguly on September 5, 2013

In 2007, Steve Jobs launched the iPhone and created the touchscreen Smartphone category. Apple had a 5 year window of opportunity and dominance, before Android touchscreen smartphones of comparable quality came anywhere close to the iPhone. Android rode on its strengths combined with Samsung’s distribution and LCD panel strengths to finally offer a comparable device to the iPhone in 2012. Android was also quick to capitalize on the low end opportunity to create volumes for itself as Samsung built dominance in smartphones with successive launches of Galaxy Note and Galaxy S series phones.

In the coming months, Apple will see a shift in strategy in the way it has driven iPhone with the launch of iPhone 5C.Its equivalent to Apple “Volksphones” – a device that targets the mid range of the markets. in doing so, Apple would go back to Jobs’s 1997 advice to Apple: take everything of value you can from the leading product and repurpose it into the next great thing.

iPhone 5C and 5S

Arguably, iPhone has hit its peak aand the way forward would be a decline if it were to persue a high end – high margin – low volume strategy. Instead Apple will now need to shift its strategy from high end – high margin- low volume to mid segment- low margin – high volume strategy. If Apple were to do this, it would be marked shift from the strategy that it has successfully pursued this far. In order to stay relevant and stay in the game, Apple would have to risk cannibalizing its high-end line (while continuing to add to its specs), by repurposing their resources into a mass-market device. There could be additional pickings through the iCloud, Siri and its Application store. Interestingly enough Apple would need to open to other arrangements such as Operator billing for Applications bought on the Apps store.

Apple has already reworked iOS into tablets and the AppleTV, and seems to have a vision for a wearable next device / phone peripheral – iWatch. Also the new Macpro by Apple, promises to be a technology disruptor with new and very high end media or gaming experiences. Thus Apple’s technology flagships are now poised to change from the iPhone/iPad to other devices – most signficatly the iWatch.

Apple has had a great run with its currently-for-sale smartphone strategy, but nobody, including certainly Apple, assumes it can continue. The question is how quickly they can re-invent the smartphone… again.

Tagged with: , ,
%d bloggers like this: